Login Register

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bell's theorem - for or against Hidden Variables?
No, I was talking about the "exploding balls" paper, "Macroscopic Observability of Spinorial Sign Changes under 2 pi Rotations". Sorry I should have checked which one was involved in Annals of Physics. "Local Causality in a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Spacetime" we discussed at length some time ago. I studied the errors mentioned by Gill, and agreed. Even found one of my own. It's the first paper, "Macroscopic Observability ...", that I thought was better, but disagreed with the conclusion - that the macro experiment with the balls would violate Bell inequality.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Bell's theorem - for or against Hidden Variables? - by secur - 10-02-2016, 08:28 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)