Login Register

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bell's theorem - for or against Hidden Variables?
Annals of Physics' editorial board, in shamefully retracting Joy Christian's previously-published paper,  gave this excuse:  " ... we have concluded that your result is in obvious conflict with a proven scientific fact, i.e., violation of local realism that has been demonstrated not only theoretically but experimentally in recent experiments, and thus your result could not be generally accepted by the physics community."

How could violation of local realism be a "proven scientific fact"?  Let's see the "proof".  It is entirely non-constructive, proving no more than its own assumptions.  The inductive conclusions of Bell-Aspect type experiments lack all correspondence to elements of reality accepted by Bell and EPR.  

Philosophy doesn't become science.  Faith doesn't replace objectivity.

Messages In This Thread
RE: Bell's theorem - for or against Hidden Variables? - by Thomas Ray - 10-01-2016, 02:01 AM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 22 Guest(s)