Login Register

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bell's theorem - for or against Hidden Variables?
(09-25-2016, 09:05 PM)secur Wrote: @Gill1109, having read it before, I believe you're right about that paper. But the one in the attachment is "Counterfactual Definiteness and Bell’s Inequality". It's true that by denying CFD, thus violating part of Bell's realism assumption, you can get around the nonlocality that way. I haven't studied it and don't yet know if this paper presents that idea correctly. (I intend to get around to it.) If you have analyzed it please tell us what you found.

Ah, this one: https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.04889  (the link in the forum didn't work for me).

Sure. Bell's realism implies CFD implies (with locality) Bell's inequality. Without CFD you don't get there. That's pretty well known.

Messages In This Thread
RE: Bell's theorem - for or against Hidden Variables? - by gill1109 - 09-27-2016, 06:51 AM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)