Login Register

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bell's theorem - for or against Hidden Variables?
(08-18-2016, 03:06 AM)secur Wrote: Richard Gill is probably right that most experimenters believe the result would be classical, that's why they're not interested in doing it.
That's not what I say in my paper. I say that any *smart* experimenter can see that the result *certainly* will be classical. Christian explains how the experimenter is to measure the local hidden variable lambda and then calculate the spin (+/- 1) in all directions of interest. In CHSH terms: for each particle pair, there will be outcomes of simultaneous measurements in directions a and a' for Alice, and in directions b and b' for Bob. All correlations will be calculated from measurements on the same N particle pairs. The CHSH inequality will hold as a matter of simple algebra.

Messages In This Thread
RE: Bell's theorem - for or against Hidden Variables? - by gill1109 - 08-22-2016, 09:30 AM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 22 Guest(s)