Login Register

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bell's theorem - for or against Hidden Variables?
Here's another way to define "Property X", which might be clearer to people not familiar with QRC and simulator software.

IF these results could be obtained with a classical experiment (no QM involved) then it would need the equivalent of a superluminal signal.

Of course, that's assuming that no one like Hess, etc, manages to provide another explanation, based on "properties of space" or "negative probabilities" or whatever.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Bell's theorem - for or against Hidden Variables? - by secur - 07-28-2016, 10:19 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)