07-24-2016, 01:12 PM
FrediFizzx: That quote was me, not Tom.
Sorry
FrediFizzx: There is no "collapse of the wave function" problem in EPR. That is a very common misconception.
I've never even heard of this misconception, and it's hard to believe it's common. I'm somewhat curious why anyone would think it was a problem? ... but it's not really worth going into.
FrediFizzx: We know what the explanation is for the "new" phenomena; space has unique spinor properties.
Ok, but this is a vague statement. Please give a reference explaining what space having "unique spinor properties" has to do with Bell's theorem.
Thomas Ray: ... Karl Hess ...
You mentioned that Hess paper a while ago, didn't seem convincing, perhaps I should look at it again
Sorry
FrediFizzx: There is no "collapse of the wave function" problem in EPR. That is a very common misconception.
I've never even heard of this misconception, and it's hard to believe it's common. I'm somewhat curious why anyone would think it was a problem? ... but it's not really worth going into.
FrediFizzx: We know what the explanation is for the "new" phenomena; space has unique spinor properties.
Ok, but this is a vague statement. Please give a reference explaining what space having "unique spinor properties" has to do with Bell's theorem.
Thomas Ray: ... Karl Hess ...
You mentioned that Hess paper a while ago, didn't seem convincing, perhaps I should look at it again