Login Register

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bell's theorem - for or against Hidden Variables?
#98
(07-20-2016, 03:08 PM)Thomas Ray Wrote: I have read it, many times.  (I assume you mean Bertlmann's Socks.)

Which is why I know that it has nothing to do with the issues of spacetime and the completeness of measurement.  It assumes nonlocality from the beginning.

That is right and all the Bell fans also assume nonlocality from the get go. Now if you make the perfectly reasonable assumption that Nature is local and realistic, then the quantum experiments prove that Bell's argument has a flaw in it somewhere.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Bell's theorem - for or against Hidden Variables? - by FrediFizzx - 07-21-2016, 07:26 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)