Login Register

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bell's theorem - for or against Hidden Variables?
#80
(07-15-2016, 08:20 PM)FrediFizzx Wrote:
(07-15-2016, 07:50 PM)Thomas Ray Wrote: Lovely.  Quantum Randi Challenge (which I don't think has anything to do with Amazing Randi; he should sue) is the biggest fraud, hoax, junk piece of science ever suggested by anyone who goes by the name 'scientist'.

Who cares about a consensus meaning?  That's for dictionaries.

LOL!  The QRC is "rigged" by the same thing we were discussing here.  That it is impossible for a quantum experiment to test the quadruple in Bell-CHSH.  Only a fool would try to play the QRC game.

Only a con man would design it.  Heads I win, tails you lose.  Ready for the toss?

(07-15-2016, 08:32 PM)Heinera Wrote:
(07-15-2016, 07:50 PM)Thomas Ray Wrote: Lovely.  Quantum Randi Challenge (which I don't think has anything to do with Amazing Randi; he should sue) is the biggest fraud, hoax, junk piece of science ever suggested by anyone who goes by the name 'scientist'.

Who cares about a consensus meaning?  That's for dictionaries.

How could the QRC be a fraud and a hoax since entrance is free, and will forever be so?

And about consensus of scientific terms and its importance...well, would you rather like to be in a Tower of Babel?

(PS: After reading through your earlier posts here and elsewhere I realize you would. In fact you are.)

Better read that logic book that you hold so dear.

Two fallacies, and a gratuitous insult.  Anyway, you made my point -- thanks.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Bell's theorem - for or against Hidden Variables? - by Thomas Ray - 07-15-2016, 08:34 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)