07-15-2016, 08:34 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-15-2016, 08:37 PM by Thomas Ray.)
(07-15-2016, 08:20 PM)FrediFizzx Wrote:(07-15-2016, 07:50 PM)Thomas Ray Wrote: Lovely. Quantum Randi Challenge (which I don't think has anything to do with Amazing Randi; he should sue) is the biggest fraud, hoax, junk piece of science ever suggested by anyone who goes by the name 'scientist'.
Who cares about a consensus meaning? That's for dictionaries.
LOL! The QRC is "rigged" by the same thing we were discussing here. That it is impossible for a quantum experiment to test the quadruple in Bell-CHSH. Only a fool would try to play the QRC game.
Only a con man would design it. Heads I win, tails you lose. Ready for the toss?
(07-15-2016, 08:32 PM)Heinera Wrote:(07-15-2016, 07:50 PM)Thomas Ray Wrote: Lovely. Quantum Randi Challenge (which I don't think has anything to do with Amazing Randi; he should sue) is the biggest fraud, hoax, junk piece of science ever suggested by anyone who goes by the name 'scientist'.
Who cares about a consensus meaning? That's for dictionaries.
How could the QRC be a fraud and a hoax since entrance is free, and will forever be so?
And about consensus of scientific terms and its importance...well, would you rather like to be in a Tower of Babel?
(PS: After reading through your earlier posts here and elsewhere I realize you would. In fact you are.)
Better read that logic book that you hold so dear.
Two fallacies, and a gratuitous insult. Anyway, you made my point -- thanks.