07-12-2016, 09:16 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-12-2016, 09:18 PM by FrediFizzx.)

(07-11-2016, 05:46 PM)Schmelzer Wrote:(07-11-2016, 05:58 AM)FrediFizzx Wrote:A reference to your #17 where you refer to some inequality with a <4 which you have invented and refer to it (with a Wiki link) as if it would be Bell's inequality.(07-11-2016, 05:08 AM)Schmelzer Wrote: Your renaming of the phrase "Bell inequalities" is irrelevant and therefore ignored.??? What up doc? How did I rename?

Now you are just being dishonest. I never ever said it was a Bell inequality. I have always said that the inequality with a bound of 4 is a different inequality from Bell-CHSH. And of course I didn't invent it. It is a natural consequence of having independent expectation terms. Which is easy to show by simple inspection.

1 - (-1) +1 +1 = 4