Login Register

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bell's theorem - for or against Hidden Variables?
(07-10-2016, 09:43 PM)Schmelzer Wrote:
(07-10-2016, 06:08 PM)FrediFizzx Wrote: It is preposterous to propose a hypothesis that is impossible to test.  Are we doing science or voodoo?
We are doing normal science.  We have some hypotheses, and combined together they lead to testable predictions, like Bell's inequalities.  

If you don't know elementary scientific methodology, this is your problem.  Testable predictions are the result of application of the whole theory,  in fact even several different theories (like theories about how all the measurement devices work).   Simple principles, taken alone, are typically untestable.
(07-10-2016, 06:08 PM)FrediFizzx Wrote: All the "Bell" experiments do is confirm that the predictions of QM are correct and nothing more.  They do not test locality or realism.
Once one can derive, starting from Einstein causality and realism, that the QM prediction has to be wrong, these experiments reject the combination of Einstein causality and realism.  Live with this.

Keep doing your wrong rationalizations; it is your problem.  The bottom line is that it is impossible to test Bell's inequalities since it is mathematically impossible for anything to violate them.  [...] Look at the simple mathematics.  It is just not possible for even QM to "violate" the inequalities.  [...]

Messages In This Thread
RE: Bell's theorem - for or against Hidden Variables? - by FrediFizzx - 07-11-2016, 03:29 AM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 42 Guest(s)