(07-09-2016, 12:04 PM)Schmelzer Wrote: The point is not if the experiment is "unphysical", but that a theory which fulfills some properties (like EPR realism and Einstein causality) has to predict that the Ak(a)Bk(b) do not depend on the question if a measurement is actually done or not. Â So we can evaluation them using an experiment where Ak(a)Bk(b) is measured, and extend the result to cases where it is not measured.
It is preposterous to propose a hypothesis that is impossible to test.  [...] All the "Bell" experiments do is confirm that the predictions of QM are correct and nothing more. They do not test locality or realism.