Login Register

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bell's theorem - for or against Hidden Variables?
Quantum theory is as complete (incomplete) as relativity.

The fact is that to prove Bell's inequality all you need are self-evident trivialities, like realism or causality, and relativity. The resulting prediction - Bell's inequality - stands against the QM prediction. Experiment has shown that QM was correct, and Bell's inequality false.

So, relativity has failed. In such a horrible way that it has to reject the very existence of reality as well as the principle that correlations have causal explanations to immunize itself. This is even worse than the immunizations used by religions - which make claims about really existing Gods or devils or so, and give fantastic but at least formally causal explanations of whatever we observe.

Messages In This Thread
RE: Bell's theorem - for or against Hidden Variables? - by Schmelzer - 06-18-2016, 02:09 PM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)