Login Register

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bell's theorem - for or against Hidden Variables?
#38
(06-18-2016, 01:54 AM)secur Wrote: Well, it's just a puzzle, that's all. I'm not worried about Bell being invalidated. If the paper is correct it constitutes another "loophole" which would be interesting. If not one could perhaps get a refutation published. There are, certainly, more useful things to do.
...
There are no loopholes since it is mathematically impossible for anything to "violate" a Bell inequality.  Come on folks, it is really simple math! 

Besides, "loopholes" implies that you think that quantum mechanics is not correct as far as the predictions for the EPR-Bohm scenario goes.  Bell's theorem is just a word statement that is based on a faulty interpretation of the inequalities.
...
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Bell's theorem - for or against Hidden Variables? - by FrediFizzx - 06-18-2016, 02:57 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)