Login Register

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bell's theorem - for or against Hidden Variables?
I would say relativity has failed when tested against quantum theory.

I do not see any reason why the hidden parameters \(\lambda\) allowed by Bell would not include some "time-like correlated" or whatever correlated hidden variables. Ok, in principle one could argue that the way how the parameters a and b are chosen it not an ideal random way.

The obvious problem with introducing some time dependence is that a measurement in direction a by Alice predefines the measurement of a by Bob with certainty and independent of the time when Bob makes the measurement.

Messages In This Thread
RE: Bell's theorem - for or against Hidden Variables? - by Schmelzer - 06-17-2016, 06:39 PM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)