Login Register

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bell's theorem - for or against Hidden Variables?
Reversibility is hidden.  When tested against the requirements of relativity, quantum theory has always failed.

If quantum numbers are supposed to exploit all the properties of the natural and real line of numbers (notably proportion and recursion), they fail.  If Bell theorists appeal to the algebraic completeness of the complex plane, they fail.

The detector-setting dependence of Bell-Aspect truncates the function.  Hess-Philipp restored time reversibility via timelike correlated parameters:  "We propose the following definition: TLCPs are parameters that exhibit correlations because they are related to periodic processes. They may depend on the setting of the station in which the periodic process occurs. The correlations are caused not by any information transfer over distance but by the fact that the stations are subject to the same physical law."  http://www.pnas.org/content/98/25/14228.full

Messages In This Thread
RE: Bell's theorem - for or against Hidden Variables? - by Thomas Ray - 06-17-2016, 10:59 AM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)