Login Register

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bell's theorem - for or against Hidden Variables?
" ... Hess and Philipp really are presenting a non-local scheme, as Gill says."

No they're not.  Gill's argument is supported by the belief that lambda can be "anything."  Hess and Phillip introduced a separate time  index.  (" ... the outcomes conditional to lambda may still depend on the space-time coordinates, and outcome independence conditional to lambda is not guaranteed.  For example, clocks in the two stations can show correlations no matter what was sent out from a source." ~ Einstein was Right! p. 80)

"I'm talking to those who accept Bell but still reject non-locality."

The better question for Gill is why he thinks non-locality is not a prior assumption of Bell's theorem.

Messages In This Thread
RE: Bell's theorem - for or against Hidden Variables? - by Thomas Ray - 08-04-2016, 04:04 PM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 30 Guest(s)