Login Register

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bell's theorem - for or against Hidden Variables?
(07-22-2016, 03:30 PM)Thomas Ray Wrote: I started to list heinera's insulting remark that you let stand, your "recommendation" to read Bell's paper, your dismissal of the relevance of multiply connected spaces (and topology in general) ... your unilateral editing of claims about quantum Randi challenge that I can well support ...
If you think some remark was insulting, please quote.

To read Bell's papers is something I can only recommend.

If you think they are relevant, feel free to present arguments for this. In the last case of my editing, I have to admit that I have simply thrown away the remaining part.

Feel free to reformulate your argument in an appropriate way. If you are not interested, good bye.

Messages In This Thread
RE: Bell's theorem - for or against Hidden Variables? - by Schmelzer - 07-22-2016, 07:44 PM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 39 Guest(s)