Login Register

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Joy Christian's LHV Model that disproves Bell
(07-07-2016, 07:19 AM)HVS Wrote:
(07-07-2016, 07:10 AM)FrediFizzx Wrote:
(07-07-2016, 06:45 AM)HVS Wrote: Fredi,

Is the right-most term of equation (50) in http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/art...1616300975 NON-local?

It contains the OUTER product of two detector orientations, the detectors being spacelike separated. (There is no problem with the INNER product and neither product has anything to do with space-time curvature.)

No, there Joy is talking about the spin of the two particles at creation.  So \(L(a \times b, \lambda)\) is local.

But a and b need not exist when the two particles are created because the detectors can be set while the particles are in flight. If  a and b did exist when the two particles are created, then that would be, most certainly, a NON-local connection!

Please read the text before that.  a and b have nothing to do with detectors yet.  Joy is just showing a bivector identity.  Really it is just math at that point but if you put it to the physics of the particle pair, just consider it at creation.

Messages In This Thread
RE: Joy Christian's LHV Model that disproves Bell - by FrediFizzx - 07-07-2016, 07:28 AM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)