Hidden Variables
Bell's theorem - for or against Hidden Variables? - Printable Version

+- Hidden Variables (https://ilja-schmelzer.de/hidden-variables)
+-- Forum: Foundations of Quantum Theory (https://ilja-schmelzer.de/hidden-variables/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: The Violation of Bell's Inequalities (https://ilja-schmelzer.de/hidden-variables/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Thread: Bell's theorem - for or against Hidden Variables? (/showthread.php?tid=8)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28


RE: Bell's theorem - for or against Hidden Variables? - Dirkman - 12-07-2016

(11-22-2016, 02:38 PM)Schmelzer Wrote: Simply, if you have superdeterminism, it makes no sense at all to search for causal explanations.  So, ok, superdeterminism is a loophole, that's well-known, but if you take it seriously you can stop doing science.

Well surely we might be predetermined to not stop doing science when finding out that everything's predetermined.


RE: Bell's theorem - for or against Hidden Variables? - secur - 12-08-2016

Maybe the universe is predetermined to determine the result of a measurement by chance, according to Born's rule


RE: Bell's theorem - for or against Hidden Variables? - Dirkman - 12-15-2016

(12-08-2016, 06:44 AM)secur Wrote: Maybe the universe is predetermined to determine the result of a measurement by chance, according to Born's rule

I opened here a thread with the supposedly classical system which you said you'll take a look at on physicsforuyms. The thread over there got closed.